Article by John Derbyshire |
||||
|
|
|||
| Hainan
at Home At the height of the 1956 Suez
crisis, the wife of the British Prime Minister is supposed to have
remarked: “It seems as
though the Suez Canal is flowing through my living-room.”
I know how she felt. This
past couple of days, the South China Sea has been lapping against my
favorite armchair. My wife,
you see, is a citizen of the People’s Republic, and there has been (as
they say in diplomatic communiqués) a full and frank exchange of views. Not that there is any cause
for alarm. Rosie and I have
been married for fifteen years, and all these secondary things have been
worked out long since. We
know the danger zones. Some
of them are fenced off altogether. Some
we wander into absent-mindedly in the course of arguing about more
practical matters. Others need some controlled venting now and again. In the interests of that
latter, I carefully broached the recent dust-up with China a couple of
days in, when the Chinese had already demanded an apology.
What did Rosie think of this demand?
She: “Of course America should apologize. It’s just a form of words.
You know what we Chinese people are like, you have to give us some
‘face’. If Bush gives
them some ‘face’, everything will soon be settled.” I pointed out that in the game
of international diplomacy, “face” is a tangible asset for any
country, and needs to be husbanded with care.
America should worry about its own “face” too. Rosie took this aboard without responding, and I thought I
had got off Hainan Island alive. I had better make clear before
proceeding that Rosie is not a political person. She grew up in China in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Mao
dictatorship was getting tired. Her
parents were both Party members, Dad actually an officer in the People’s
Liberation Army, a veteran of the Korean War.
By the time Rosie reached maturity, though, widespread cynicism had
set in among the Chinese population, and people slept through Political
Study lectures. When I first
knew her, in China in the early 1980s, Rosie made me think of Julia in Nineteen
Eighty-Four Except
where it touched upon her own life she had no interest in Party doctrine
... In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully
on people incapable of understanding it.
They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of
reality, because they ... were not sufficiently interested in public
events to notice what was happening.
By lack of understanding they remained sane.
They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them
no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will
pass undigested through the body of a bird. This, I have come to
understand, needs some modifying. It
is true that if you asked Rosie to explain the Labor Theory of Value or
describe precisely the difference between a poor peasant and a
lower-middle peasant, she would flip into deer-in-the-headlights mode.
She does not, in fact, like the Communists, having had a run-in
with them herself. On the other hand she is
Chinese, and the notion that any Chinese government could ever
do anything wrong in its dealings with the world Beyond the Wall is very
difficult for her to grasp. Theirs
is not, to put it very mildly indeed, a self-critical culture.
(Which is why the deepest humiliation the Communists can impose on
any citizen is to force them to write a “self-criticism”.)
Thus, when, a week into the
crisis, it looked as thought the U.S. was going to stand firm, I got into
a spot of bother with my suggestion that perhaps George W. Bush should
counter the Chinese demand for an apology by demanding an apology from them.
After all, I pointed out, the U.S. plane was over international
waters, and the F-8s must have been flying awfully close for the accident
to have happened — close enough to fairly be accused of harrassment,
whatever the precise details of the mishap. Rosie:
“Nonsense! China
give an apology to America? You’re
mad! What was that plane
doing so close to our shore? Spying,
that’s what! You foreigners
think you can just do as you like in China!
...” In less time
than it takes to hit the MAYDAY button on an EP-3 control panel, we were
into the Opium War and the suppression of the Boxers.
Dialectical Materialism may have passed undigested through
Rosie’s alimentary canal, but the xenophobic stuff went direct into her
bloodstream. It’s OK. In the style of Mao Tse-tung, who was fond of comparing crises in the Party with earthquakes, this is no worse than a 4 on the Richter scale. It certainly doesn’t compare with last August 6th, a Sunday, and a day that will live in infamy, when I woke early with the horrible realization that it was our wedding anniversary, crept out of the house, spent a frantic hour trying to find a card store that was open, and got home ... too late. Harmony will re-assert itself. I just have to follow the President’s example: be patient, and do some measured grovelling. |
||||